// For patent litigators

Assess merits
with evidence

In patent litigation the outcome often turns on prior art that was never found during prosecution. ATTVC finds it.

Invalidity

Prior art search

Find prior art that anticipates or renders obvious the asserted claims. Semantic search finds what the original examiner's keyword search missed.

Infringement

Claim construction

Understand the full scope of asserted claims — including equivalents. Map the prosecution history to identify file wrapper estoppel constraints.

Equivalents

Doctrine of equivalents

Identify whether accused products or processes perform substantially the same function in substantially the same way to achieve substantially the same result.

Damages

Portfolio valuation

Assess the strength and scope of the patent portfolio at issue. Identify comparable licenses and understand the reasonable royalty landscape.

IPR / PGR

Post-grant proceedings

Build inter partes review petitions grounded in the strongest prior art — found by semantic search, not just the references the examiner considered.

Strategy

Early case assessment

Evaluate the merits of a case before committing to litigation. Understand the prior art landscape and claim scope before the first filing.

// Get started

Build stronger positions

Request access to the ATTVC platform and see what knowledge discovery adds to your litigation practice.

Request access →